Hall of business building with light from window
Call Us 24/7 at (508) 455-4755

Get your life back on track with a lawyer that helps people every day avoid an OUI conviction: See our results and testimonials

Client Reviews
over 146 reviews
Our Results
over 230 results
Request a Free Consultation

Motion Hearings in Dedham OUI Cases

There are two different types or motion hearings in Dedham OUI cases. An evidentiary motion hearing is one opportunity for lawyers to cross-examine the police officers or any other witnesses in the case. They do this to determine how they are going to testify at trial and also to determine whether or not a client’s rights have been violated.

After the motion hearing, if there is an argument to be made that a accused’s rights have been violated. Therefore, an experienced OUI attorney can then argue that certain evidence should be suppressed.

OUI Motion Hearing Process

For a person facing an OUI charge, the defense will file a motion to suppress the stop and exit of a defendant. Essentially in this motion, the defense is looking to see if the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop the person and then to order them out of the vehicle.

Often, this also is an opportunity for the defense to see how the officer is going to testify about the operator’s driving ability and their reaction time. Another common motion is a motion to suppress a search of the client’s vehicle, which happens a lot in cases in which somebody is pulled over and has alcohol in the car.

Expectations After the Motion Hearing is Filed

Once a motion hearing is filed, it will then be scheduled, so the actual motion in and of itself has to be filed in the court. It is provided to the District attorney’s office. The District attorney’s office will summon witnesses for that motion hearing and then it will be scheduled, typically about a month or a month and a half out.

In Dedham, there is no formal written response from the District attorney’s office. They reserve their argument for the date of the motion hearing and then on the date of the motion, they call their witness, they get direct testimony from that witness, and they make an argument in opposition to the defense counsel’s motion.

Understanding the Motion to Suppress Evidence Process

Defense counsel will file a motion to suppress evidence if they believe that the individuals rights have been violated in some way. Due to that violation, certain evidence should be suppressed. Defense counsel will file motion hearings in Dedham OUI cases if they believe that a defendant was interrogated without being mirandized.

They will make the argument at the hearing and, depending on the officer’s testimony, the defense counsel will make an argument that any statements made were in violation of the defendant’s Miranda rights. Defense counsel will be looking to suppress those statements. The same process applies for a motion to suppress any sort of physical evidence such as alcohol in the car.

The process begins with the motion being filed, the officer is summoned to appear, and defense counsel has an opportunity to cross-examine the police officer and make an argument that the police officer violated the client’s rights to their Fourth Amendment rights. If the counsel is successful in their argument, then evidence such as alcohol from the car would be suppressed.

What is a Motion to Compel Discovery?

Defense counsel will often use a motion hearings in Dedham OUI cases to preserve evidence, typically with respect to a booking video. They would make an argument that asks the court to order the police to preserve any video. However, they do not use a motion to compel discovery because the Commonwealth is already under an obligation to provide any sort of discovery that they have in their custody and control.

The most common motions filed in an OUI case would be the motion to preserve any video evidence and Rule 17 motions to get surveillance video or medical records. Other common motions include the motion to suppress statements, the motion to suppress search of the vehicle, and the motion to suppress the stop and exit order.

When Can an OUI Lawyer File a Motion Dismiss?

If there is a viable motion to dismiss an OUI in Dedham that is obvious from the filing documents, a person’s OUI defense attorney should file that as soon as possible at the arraignment, or in between the arraignment and the pre-trial date. If new information comes to light later, the attorney can file a motion to dismiss at that time.

A lawyer may file a motion to dismiss when the police report does not show probable cause that somebody was under the influence of alcohol or if they were not on a public way. For example, if the person was on a private road, and that does not satisfy one of the elements of operating under the influence in Massachusetts, the defense attorney might file a motion to dismiss. If there are procedural issues such as not being offered the clerk’s hearing, or there is a speedy trial issue because the trial is past the timing standards in Massachusetts, a defense attorney might file a motion to dismiss for a speedy trial.

What Must be Included in the Motion to Dismiss?

A motion to dismiss includes:

  • The request from the defense attorney as to why they believe the motion is appropriate
  • Applicable case law supporting the motion
  • An affidavit of counsel
  • An affidavit of the defendant
Benefit of Speaking to an Attorney

The defense does motion hearings in Dedham OUI cases to suppress statements, if there are certain statements that are made that would be detrimental to a client’s case. An OUI attorney can file a motion and then argue that motion to see if the officers complied with their requirements under Miranda. If there is evidence that they did not follow those requirements, then those statements can be suppressed.

The defense attorney will have a motion hearing to determine whether or not the officer had a warrant and, if they did not have a warrant, to see if any of the exceptions to the warrant requirement applied. If there is an argument that the officers violated the defendant’s rights with respect to the search of the vehicle, the defense attorney would make an argument that any alcohol found in the car be suppressed at trial.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael was very professional and explained the process clearly and told us to be patient. After one year the charges got dismissed in the trial. Excellent knowledge of the court systems in the area of Boston. Would highly recommend him Ashwani
★★★★★
A careless decision on my part left me facing charges which would have severely hampered my ability to stay employed and support myself. But attorney DelSignore's skillful analysis and challenging of the evidence against me resulted in a conviction on a lesser charge. Now I'll be able to go on with my life, having learned a lesson I'll never forget. Thank you, Michael. Scott
★★★★★
Mike stuck with my case for 3.5 years and always kept me informed regarding the status. Ultimately, because of his due diligence, we ended up with an OUI not guilty verdict. This case could have gone many ways but his thorough review of the case and exceptional preparedness for trial ultimately drove a positive outcome. Thank you Mike! David
★★★★★
Michael DelSignore did an amazing job with my case! Either him or his partner Julie was always available to answer any questions I had and helped walked me through the entire process. I could not have done it without them! I highly recommend choosing this law firm to deal with your legal needs, you will not be dissatisfied. Ashley
★★★★★
I cannot express the gratitude towards both Michael and Julie for their amazing work and help. It was a very stressful event and they certainly put me at as much ease as possible. From start to finish it took 14 months and all the way through they were both very engaged with me. Today was worth the wait, Michael was great in court and I was rightfully found not guilty. I would recommend Michael and Julie over and over again. Claire
Contact Us for a Free Consultation
(508) 455-4755(781) 686-5924