Mobile Icons

Text DelSignore Law at 781-686-5924 with your name and what kind of charge you are texting regarding.

Massachusetts OUI Lawyer Resources

This page is a list of DUI resources that come up in Massachusetts OUI cases. These are cases that lawyers need access to and resources that are necessary to defend OUI alcohol and OUI drug cases in court. I have included some of the common cases that I frequently look to reference in court as well as some materials that I use for cross examination. Examples include important Massachusetts OUI cases, resources for trial in Massachusetts OUI cases, and Judge Brennan’s decision allowing breath test evidence back in Massachusetts OUI cases.

Commonwealth v. Bohigian, The Commonwealth needs to prove consent for any blood draw for use in an OUI case. This case held that a warrant cannot defeat the consent requirement imposed by the statute.

Commonwealth v. Eric A. Richards

This case is used by the RMV to argue that a request for license reinstatement after a not guilty must be made immediately. This case has been drastically misinterpreted by the RMV.

Commonwealth v. Curley, 78 Mass. App. Ct. 163 (2010)

This case stands on the theory that if a defendant attempts to take a breath test with no result, the Commonwealth can admit that into evidence. A client trying to deceive the machine who ultimately does not get a breath test result could have this evidence admitted at trial.

Commonwealth v. Ralph Pierre, 72 Mass. App. Ct. 230 (2008)

This is the case requiring the 15-minute observation period before a defendant takes a breath test.


Commonwealth v. Thomas J. Gerhardt, 477 Mass. 775, (2017)

This case held that the field sobriety are not scientific tests and the jury should be informed that the field tests were never studied for marijuana. Equally important for OUI the marijuana cases, the Court held that officers cannot testify that someone is impaired by marijuana without expert training.

State of Maryland v. Consolidated Cases (Brightful case) (IMPORTANT DRUG RECOGNITION EXPERT CASE)

This case addressed the issue of trial testimony of Drug Recognition Officers when the defendant is suspected of driving under the influence of drugs.

If you have any questions about these cases & how they impact your clients OUI charge, feel free to call Attorney DelSignore at 781-686-5924.

Client Reviews
Michael was very professional and explained the process clearly and told us to be patient. After one year the charges got dismissed in the trial. Excellent knowledge of the court systems in the area of Boston. Would highly recommend him Ashwani
A careless decision on my part left me facing charges which would have severely hampered my ability to stay employed and support myself. But attorney DelSignore's skillful analysis and challenging of the evidence against me resulted in a conviction on a lesser charge. Now I'll be able to go on with my life, having learned a lesson I'll never forget. Thank you, Michael. Scott
Mike stuck with my case for 3.5 years and always kept me informed regarding the status. Ultimately, because of his due diligence, we ended up with an OUI not guilty verdict. This case could have gone many ways but his thorough review of the case and exceptional preparedness for trial ultimately drove a positive outcome. Thank you Mike! David
Michael DelSignore did an amazing job with my case! He was always available to answer any questions I had and helped walked me through the entire process. I could not have done it without them! I highly recommend choosing this law firm to deal with your legal needs, you will not be dissatisfied. Ashley
I cannot express the gratitude towards Michael for his amazing work and help. It was a very stressful event and they certainly put me at as much ease as possible. From start to finish it took 14 months and all the way through they were both very engaged with me. Today was worth the wait, Michael was great in court and I was rightfully found not guilty. I would recommend Michael over and over again. Claire