The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. Zoanne Zeininger which addressed the issue of whether the Sixth Amendment requires the Commonwealth to present the live testimony of a witness from the Office of Alcohol Testing in order to admit breathalyzer test results at a Massachusetts DUI…
Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog
Proving Prior Convictions in Second Offense Massachusetts DUI arrest
When you are charged with a Second Offense DUI in Massachusetts, how does the Commonwealth prove that you had a prior conviction. The Appeals Court addressed this issue in the case of Commonwealth v. Ellis which was decided on April 25, 2011. The Ellis case involved an appeal of a…
Rhode Island Legislator Charged with Drunk Driving, Possession of Marijuana, at Sobriety Checkpoint
A Rhode Island lawmaker has been charged with driving under the influence and possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia after being stopped at a DUI checkpoint in Connecticut, Channel 12 News reported. A Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer has more ground upon which to challenge charges that result from a car…
Massachusetts Appeals Court addresses Identification issue in appeal from Wrentham District Court Open and Gross Lewdness Conviction
As a Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer, the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court holds that smell of burnt marijuana is insufficient to justify an exit order
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court addressed an important legal issues that arose once the Massachusetts legislature decriminalized simple possession of under one ounce of marijuana. Does the smell of burnt marijuana justify an order that a motorist exit a motor vehicle. In the case of Commonwealth v. Cruz, decided April…
United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. New Mexico which could impact the admissibility of breathalyzer evidence in Massachusetts
Bullcoming v. New Mexico raises a significant issue under the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause regarding scientific and blood test evidence in Massachusetts drunk driving cases with breathalyzer or blood test results. The State of New Mexico attempted to present evidence to prove the defendant’s blood alcohol content through a surrogate…
United States Supreme Court diminishes right of confrontation in case of Michigan v. Bryant
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. Bryant, decided today, diminishes the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. The Court held that statements are nontestimonial and thus not covered by the Sixth Amendment confrontation clause when the primary purpose of the statement is to allow the police to respond…
United States Supreme Court declines to hear case raising the issue of whether Constitution requires unanimous jury verdict
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. Louisiana which raises the issue of whether the Constitution requires a unanimous jury verdict to support a criminal conviction. Click on this link to read the filings from the case on the…
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral argument in Commonwealth v. Zeininger regarding admissibility of breathalyzer test results at DUI trial
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments on February 7, 2011 in the case of Commonwealth v. Zeininger, which was an appeal of a drunk driving conviction out of the Greenfield District Court. The defendants in the case filed an appeal with the Massachusetts Court of Appeals, which the…
Comments on recent Appeals Court decision on the breathalyzer margin of error
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals, in the case of Commonwealth v. Rumery, decided February 4, 2011, issued a decision regarding the margin of error of the breathalyzer at Massachusetts DUI trials. The court ruled that a defendant is not entitled to a jury instruction that the breathalyzer has an inherent…